Skip to main content
Glama
dinesh7wd

mcp-server-competitor-content

by dinesh7wd

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-competitor-content

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables SEO page generation with competitor research and Schema.org structured data. Provides tools to search competitors for a keyword and generate high-quality SEO content with FAQPage schema.
      2
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables semantic keyword clustering, search intent classification, cannibalization detection, and topical authority mapping for SEO workflows.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Advanced content gap analysis using Query Decomposition and Keyword Fan-Out (Google's patented methodology). Tells you exactly what user queries your content covers - and what it misses. Built on academic research because I needed to understand how AI search engines actually evaluate content.
      1
      336 npm
      13
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to cluster keyword lists, classify search intent, detect Google Search Console keyword cannibalization, score title tags and meta descriptions for CTR, and generate content briefs, all deterministically and locally from their own pasted data with no API key required. It also flags fixes such as canonical targets and merge actions for competing pages.
      5
      64 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of competitor content analysis: scraping, keyword extraction, heading comparison, gap analysis, readability, quality scoring, SERP features, and clustering. The boundaries are clear, with content_gap_analysis serving as a higher-level composite rather than overlapping with the lower-level tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case and are descriptive, but patterns are mixed: some follow verb_noun (scrape_page, extract_keywords, cluster_competitors) while others are noun_noun (content_gap_analysis, readability_score, serp_features). This is still readable and predictable, but not a single consistent verb-first convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for the server's purpose. Each tool covers a meaningful step in competitor content analysis without unnecessary redundancy or feature bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the core workflow: fetch competitor content, extract and compare keywords/headings, assess readability and quality, detect SERP features, and cluster competitors. No critical operations are missing for the stated domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues