get_dashboard

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description carries full burden. While 'Get' implies a read operation, the description discloses no behavioral traits regarding data freshness (real-time vs cached), permission requirements, performance characteristics for large accounts, or what the overview structure contains beyond the three mentioned entities.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with action verb and scope. No redundancy or filler. Every word contributes to understanding the tool's scope and target resources.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a parameter-less read operation, but gaps remain given the lack of output schema or annotations. Description omits return value structure, whether archived items are included, and how this aggregate view relates to the more specific sibling query tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema contains zero parameters. Per evaluation rules, zero parameters establish a baseline score of 4. The description does not need to compensate for missing parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb ('Get') and resource ('overview of all products, agents, and lead counts'). The scope 'across the entire Swarmix account' implicitly distinguishes this from sibling tools like get_agent_stats (likely per-agent) and list_agents, though explicit contrast with alternatives is not provided.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus sibling tools like get_activity, get_agent_stats, or get_funnel. No mention of prerequisites or conditions where this overview is most valuable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.