auth_status
Check the OAuth authentication and connection status to ensure the service is ready for use.
Instructions
Check OAuth and connection status.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Check the OAuth authentication and connection status to ensure the service is ready for use.
Check OAuth and connection status.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. Only states 'check' without mentioning read-only nature, side effects, or required permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence with no redundant words. Perfectly front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Low complexity tool with no parameters, but no output schema or description of return format. Adequate for basic use, but could clarify what 'status' means in the response.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist; schema coverage is 100%. Baseline is 4 as per guidelines.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clear verb 'Check' and resource 'OAuth and connection status' precisely state the tool's purpose. No sibling tool performs this exact function, so no differentiation needed.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool or when alternatives might be better. For a simple status check, explicit usage hints are not critical but still absent.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/didtjd59/yt-dj-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server