korean-patent-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to korean-patent-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving South Korean intellectual property data via the KIPRIS Plus Open API. Users can perform patent searches, look up bibliographic information, and convert natural language into KIPRIS search queries.62-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and analyzing Korean patents through the KIPRIS API using natural language. Supports patent search by applicant name, detailed patent information retrieval, and citation analysis.32MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables searching Korean patents, trademarks, and designs via KIPRIS Plus open APIs. Supports keyword, advanced, applicant, and rightholder searches with detailed bibliographic lookup.7102 npm54MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query and analyze Korean law, including statutes, precedents, and ordinances, with citation verification and impact analysis.101,624 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceIntegrates Korean startup laws (19 curated laws) and K-Startup support programs, enabling legal article search, citation verification, reference tracking, and program lookup with real-time status.1-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving Korean Supreme Court precedents from the law.go.kr Open API, with support for keyword search and detailed judgment text.2-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
verify_citations validates an entire text's patent numbers, rights_alive checks a single patent's legal status, and search_ip performs keyword searches. All three are distinct, though verify_citations internally overlaps with rights_alive's status determination.
Two tools use verb_noun naming (verify_citations, search_ip), but rights_alive breaks the pattern with a noun_adjective construction. Minor inconsistency that doesn't create confusion.
3 tools is slim but reasonable for a focused patent-verification MCP server: search, single-status check, and full-text validation. The scope is narrow enough that each tool has a clear purpose.
The set covers search, individual status checks, and bulk citation verification, but lacks operations like fetching full patent details, family/priority data, or legal-event history. Agents can achieve the core goal but may need workarounds for deeper analysis.