delete_custom_skill
Remove a custom skill from V.I.S.O.R. by providing its unique skill ID.
Instructions
Deletes a custom skill.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| skill_id | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Remove a custom skill from V.I.S.O.R. by providing its unique skill ID.
Deletes a custom skill.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| skill_id | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It merely states 'Deletes a custom skill' without indicating irreversibility, side effects, or permission requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short, consisting of one brief sentence. While front-loaded, it lacks substantive content to justify its brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete tool with one parameter and no annotations, the description provides minimal context. It fails to clarify return values, error conditions, or scope of deletion.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the tool description adds no meaning to the 'skill_id' parameter beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Deletes' and resource 'custom skill'. This is sufficiently distinct from siblings like 'add_custom_skill'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs. alternatives (e.g., hiding a skill or deactivating it), nor any prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dibun75/visor'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server