Skip to main content
Glama
diagrammo
by diagrammo

Related Servers

Alternatives to dgmo-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that generates Mermaid diagrams with live browser preview, supports real-time rendering and SVG/PNG export.
      13
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for generating and editing architecture diagrams from natural language or code, supporting formats like Terraform, docker-compose, Kubernetes, SQL, Mermaid, and PlantUML.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for creating and editing diagrams using draw.io. Allows generating diagrams from Mermaid or XML, searching shapes, and opening them in draw.io for export.
      2
      0
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for creating and managing Excalidraw diagrams, supporting elements, libraries, icons, import/export, and auto-layout flowcharts.
      3,837 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The set cleanly separates authoring aids (suggest_chart_type, get_language_reference, get_examples, validate_diagram) from output routes (render_diagram, preview_diagram, share_diagram, open_in_app) and cloud storage operations. The main risk is among the output routes—render_diagram vs preview_diagram and share_diagram vs open_in_app could momentarily confuse, but descriptions make the destination and return type clear. check_app_installed further disambiguates routing decisions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use snake_case with a verb_noun pattern, and the cloud tools consistently scope with the space_ prefix (put/get/list_space_diagram). Minor deviations like open_in_app and check_app_installed break the strict verb_noun_ pattern but remain readable and intentional. Overall predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools fit comfortably in the well-scoped range and each covers a distinct facet of the diagram workflow (chartering, reference, validation, rendering, output, cloud persistence). No tool feels redundant or padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full authoring lifecycle from chart suggestion through validation, rendering, sharing, and report generation, plus cloud read/write/list. The one notable gap is a delete_space_diagram operation—cloud storage supports create/read/list but no removal. Agents can otherwise complete all core workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow