plr-mcp
by di-omics
README.md
# plr-mcp
[](https://github.com/di-omics/plr-mcp/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
A [Model Context Protocol](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) server for
[PyLabRobot](https://github.com/PyLabRobot/pylabrobot). It exposes a liquid
handler, a plate reader, a thermocycler, and a heater-shaker as MCP tools, so
any MCP client (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or your own agent) can run
lab-automation steps by calling tools instead of writing PyLabRobot code.
It ships in **simulation mode** by default. Every tool runs end to end against
PyLabRobot's chatterbox backends with no instruments attached, so you can try
the whole thing on a laptop. Point it at real hardware by setting one
environment variable (see below).
Verified against PyLabRobot 0.2.1.
## Why an MCP server (and not just tool-use)
Driving PyLabRobot from a Claude skill or direct tool-calls is tool-use inside
one agent. An MCP server is a standalone process that speaks the Model Context
Protocol over stdio, so *any* MCP client can discover and call these tools
without knowing anything about PyLabRobot. This repo is the server.
## Install
```bash
git clone https://github.com/di-omics/plr-mcp.git
cd plr-mcp
pip install -e .
```
This pulls in `mcp` and `pylabrobot`.
## Prove it works (no hardware)
```bash
python examples/smoke_test.py
```
It drives every tool through the chatterbox backends and prints `ALL OK` when
the run succeeds.
## Run the server
```bash
plr-mcp # stdio transport, chatterbox simulation
PLR_MCP_BACKEND=star plr-mcp # target a real liquid handler instead
```
## Tools
Every tool is registered under a `plr_` prefix so it stays unambiguous when this
server is loaded next to others.
| Tool | What it does |
|-----------------|--------------|
| `plr_connect_check` | Zero-motion hardware pre-flight: open the link to a real instrument, read its identity, close. Does not move the arm. See the [hardware bring-up guide](docs/hardware-bringup.md). |
| `plr_setup_deck` | Build the liquid handler for the chosen backend and, for the liquid handler family, place a tip rack and a 96-well plate. Call this first. `home=true` homes a real STAR (motion; deck must be clear). |
| `plr_deck_state` | List the resources on the deck and the run mode. |
| `plr_pick_up_tips` | Pick up tips from the tip rack for a well range (for example `A1:H1`). |
| `plr_drop_tips` | Return tips to the rack. |
| `plr_aspirate` | Aspirate a volume from each plate well in a range. |
| `plr_dispense` | Dispense a volume into each plate well in a range. |
| `plr_transfer` | One head pass: pick up, aspirate, dispense, drop. |
| `plr_read_plate` | Read absorbance, fluorescence, or luminescence. |
| `plr_thermocycler` | Set block or lid temperature, open or close the lid, deactivate, status. |
| `plr_heater_shaker` | Set temperature, shake, stop, deactivate, status. |
| `plr_generate_analysis_pipeline` | Generate a tool-agnostic, UMI-aware single-cell RNA-seq workflow with runtime-configured hooks for optional demultiplexing, UMI preprocessing, alignment, counting, and downstream analysis. Hook implementations are not bundled. |
| `plr_run_pcr_enrichment_round1` | Run a validated PCR enrichment round 1 master-mix protocol by importing and executing the operator's existing starlab script (not a reimplementation). `chatterbox` dry-runs; `star` requires `confirm=true` (human-gated). See below. |
Well ranges use PyLabRobot syntax: a single well `A1`, a column `A1:H1`, or a
partial column `A1:D1`.
### Tool semantics
Beyond names, the tools carry machine-readable metadata so an agent can use them
safely:
- **Annotations.** Each tool advertises MCP hints (`readOnlyHint`,
`destructiveHint`, `idempotentHint`, `openWorldHint`). Probes like
`plr_connect_check`, `plr_deck_state`, and `plr_read_plate` are read-only;
`plr_setup_deck` (with `home`), the liquid-handling tools, `plr_thermocycler`,
`plr_heater_shaker`, and `plr_run_pcr_enrichment_round1` are marked destructive, so a
client can warn before anything moves on real hardware.
- **`simulated` flag.** Every result includes `simulated`. `true` means the
numbers came from a chatterbox backend with no instrument attached; never read
a `simulated: true` value as a real measurement.
- **Structured output.** Tools declare an output schema and return
`structuredContent`, so clients parse results against a named shape instead of
an opaque object (requires `mcp>=1.9`).
- **Errors.** Invalid arguments and unmet preconditions (unknown backend, bad
well range, moving before `setup_deck`/home) are raised as tool errors.
Expected operational states a correct call can still hit (hardware unreachable
from this host, missing vendor extra, a human-gated real run awaiting
`confirm=true`) come back as a normal result with `ok: false` and a `notes`
list to act on.
## Connect a client
### Claude Code
This repo ships a project-scoped [`.mcp.json`](.mcp.json), so just open the repo
in Claude Code and approve the **`plr`** server when prompted (check `/mcp` or
`claude mcp list`). It starts on the `chatterbox` backend, and Claude Code loads
[`CLAUDE.md`](CLAUDE.md) for the tool catalog and safety rules. Tools appear
prefixed `plr_` (for example `plr_aspirate`).
Prefer to register it yourself instead:
```bash
claude mcp add --transport stdio plr -- plr-mcp
```
Either way, `plr-mcp` must be on PATH (`pip install -e .`); otherwise use the
absolute path from `which plr-mcp`, or `-- python -m plr_mcp.server`.
### Claude Desktop
Add this to `claude_desktop_config.json`:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"plr": {
"command": "plr-mcp"
}
}
}
```
If `plr-mcp` is not on the client's PATH, use the absolute path to the console
script (`which plr-mcp`) or run it as `python -m plr_mcp.server`.
## Backends
Pick the liquid-handling backend with `PLR_MCP_BACKEND`, or override it per
session in a `setup_deck` call (`backend="star"`, etc.).
| Backend | PyLabRobot backend | Deck | Runs with no hardware |
|--------------|--------------------------|-------------|-----------------------|
| `chatterbox` | `LiquidHandlerChatterboxBackend` | STARLet | yes (default) |
| `star` | `STARBackend` (liquid handler) | STARLet | no |
| `ot2` | `OpentronsOT2Backend` (needs `host`) | OTDeck | no |
| `evo` | `EVOBackend` (Tecan Freedom EVO) | EVO150 | no |
Only `chatterbox` runs with no instrument. The other three construct the real
PyLabRobot backend (correct API for 0.2.1) and attempt to connect; if no
instrument is reachable, or a vendor extra such as `pylabrobot[opentrons]` is
not installed, `setup_deck` reports that in `notes` instead of crashing. The
liquid handler tip and plate auto-load only for `chatterbox` and `star`; `ot2` and
`evo` use vendor-specific labware, so load your own.
**Driving a real STAR moves a physical arm.** `setup_deck(home=true)` homes the
channels and iSWAP. The `star` backend defaults to a zero-motion connect and
blocks every liquid-handling tool until you home on a clear deck. Follow the
[hardware bring-up guide](docs/hardware-bringup.md) for the first run.
For `ot2`, pass the robot IP:
```bash
PLR_MCP_BACKEND=ot2 PLR_MCP_OT2_HOST=169.254.1.1 plr-mcp
```
The non-liquid-handling instruments (plate reader, thermocycler, heater-shaker)
run on chatterbox simulation and expose real hardware backends as clearly
marked extension points in `plr_mcp/lab.py` (the `_ensure_*` methods). Wire in
your own (for example an Inheco ODTC thermocycler or a BioTek reader) and
validate on your deck before trusting a run.
## Running a validated protocol
`run_pcr_enrichment_round1` does not reimplement a protocol. It imports an existing,
hardware-validated starlab script and calls its own functions. Liquid parameters,
geometry, and tip logic remain operator-owned in that external run card; the MCP
wrapper does not bundle them and fails closed when the transfer contract is
incomplete. Point it at the scripts:
```bash
export PLR_MCP_STARLAB_DIR=/path/to/plr-tested/liquid-handler/starlab_live
```
On a real run, follow the same ladder the scripts require: a clean
`chatterbox` dry-run, then `mode='deck'` on the instrument (assignment only),
then the transfer with a person watching. The `star` backend refuses to run
without `confirm=true`, because a real run homes the arm and moves liquid.
## Layout
```
.mcp.json Claude Code project-scoped registration (starts on chatterbox)
CLAUDE.md guide Claude Code auto-loads (tools + safety rules)
plr_mcp/
lab.py stateful PyLabRobot wrapper (all the real calls live here)
server.py FastMCP server, one thin tool per Lab method
schemas.py TypedDict result shapes (the tools' output schemas)
protocols.py validated starlab protocol wrappers (run_pcr_enrichment_round1)
analysis.py single-cell RNA-seq pipeline generator
tests/
test_lab.py pytest suite, runs on chatterbox (no hardware)
examples/
smoke_test.py end-to-end run with no hardware
evals/
plr_mcp_eval.xml agent-usability questions answerable on chatterbox
```
## Development
```bash
pip install -e '.[dev]'
ruff check plr_mcp tests # lint
ruff format --check plr_mcp tests
mypy plr_mcp --check-untyped-defs
pytest -q
```
CI runs all four on Python 3.10 through 3.13 for every push and pull request.
## License
MIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 10 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct operation (aspirate, dispense, transfer, tip handling, deck setup, heater-shaker, thermocycler, plate reader) with no overlaps. Actions are clearly separated.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names use lower_snake_case with clear verb_noun patterns (e.g., pick_up_tips, drop_tips, read_plate). Naming is uniform and predictable.
Tool Count5/5
10 tools cover core liquid handling and lab equipment operations without being excessive. Each tool earns its place for a robotics lab server.
Completeness4/5
Covers setup, liquid transfers, tip management, temperature control, and reading. Minor gaps like explicit mixing or pause/move commands exist, but transfer can handle mixing.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues