Skip to main content
Glama
dhuzard

Research Deposition MCP

by dhuzard

Related Servers

Alternatives to Research Deposition MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to operate DSpace repositories through a typed interface, including SAF package building, metadata editing, scientometric harvesting, open-access PDF downloads, and repository administration.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to validate deliverables (JSON, ZIP, PDF, DOCX) against signed contracts, generating verifiable receipts with Ed25519 signatures.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable AI agents to work on bounded project folders through read, write, run, and verify tools, with durable approval/resume workflows and completion proven by observed verification evidence rather than self-reported results.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to search, retrieve, and list open-licensed documents with verifiable provenance, attaching sha256, DOI, and OpenTimestamps proof to every response.
      1,674 npm
      Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create cryptographically verifiable receipts of their delegated work, with capabilities for multi-party approval and offline verification.
      11
      50 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to index and search local skill libraries, persist and resume task checkpoints, and run validated workflow plans with controlled approval and write permissions.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct responsibility in the deposition lifecycle—status, validation, manifest building, package building, draft creation, retrieval, update, file upload, review, and publication. Even the two validation-related tools (validate_deposition and create_draft) are separated by action, and descriptions clarify their boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (validate_deposition, build_file_manifest, create_draft, upload_file, publish_draft), but a few use noun-first names (deposition_status, publication_review) that break the pattern slightly. This is a minor deviation and does not impede understanding.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools covering the complete deposition workflow, the count is well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool serves a necessary, non-redundant role in the pipeline, and none feel extraneous.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full deposition lifecycle: validation, manifest/package building, draft creation/retrieval/update, file upload, review, and publication. There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose—only minor absent operations like listing or deleting drafts, which are not critical to the core workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive