Skip to main content
Glama
dhuzard

Research Deposition MCP

by dhuzard

Related Servers

Alternatives to Research Deposition MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic, harness-neutral research workflows by unifying research object identity, evidence receipts, claim-evidence graphs, and append-only decision logs, along with specialized scholarly skills for literature analysis, reproducibility audits, and multi-agent review.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to operate DSpace repositories through a typed interface, including SAF package building, metadata editing, scientometric harvesting, open-access PDF downloads, and repository administration.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching HAL and preparing, validating, and submitting publication deposits via SWORD, with dry-run validation and explicit submission control.
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching Zenodo records, resolving DOIs and URLs, tracing version series and funding, listing files, and previewing text file contents (including inside ZIP archives) over MCP.
      47 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to validate deliverables (JSON, ZIP, PDF, DOCX) against signed contracts, generating verifiable receipts with Ed25519 signatures.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP clients to run research as an explicit scientific process: forming hypotheses, designing and executing sealed experiments, capturing observations and artifacts, linking claims to supporting evidence, and reviewing provenance. Exposes coordinated MCP services so users can inspect, reproduce, and audit every step from question to conclusion rather than trusting an opaque final answer.
      46
      2,530 PyPI
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct responsibility in the deposition lifecycle—status, validation, manifest building, package building, draft creation, retrieval, update, file upload, review, and publication. Even the two validation-related tools (validate_deposition and create_draft) are separated by action, and descriptions clarify their boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (validate_deposition, build_file_manifest, create_draft, upload_file, publish_draft), but a few use noun-first names (deposition_status, publication_review) that break the pattern slightly. This is a minor deviation and does not impede understanding.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools covering the complete deposition workflow, the count is well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool serves a necessary, non-redundant role in the pipeline, and none feel extraneous.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full deposition lifecycle: validation, manifest/package building, draft creation/retrieval/update, file upload, review, and publication. There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose—only minor absent operations like listing or deleting drafts, which are not critical to the core workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive