No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 27 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: auth operations, library management, file operations, and share links are all cleanly separated. Even similar tools like upload_file vs update_file or rename_library vs rename_item have unambiguous boundaries. No two tools could be confused.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., list_libraries, create_directory, auth_rotate). The auth_ prefix groups session tools, while resource-specific verbs (list, get, create, update, rename, move, copy) are applied uniformly. No mixed conventions or vague verbs.
27 tools is slightly above the typical heavy threshold, but each tool addresses a distinct operation needed for a full file server integration (auth, libraries, files, shares). While the count feels a bit large, the scope justifies it, and the tools are all useful without redundancy.
The tool surface lacks delete operations for files, folders, libraries, and share links, which are essential for a complete file management lifecycle. Users can create, read, update, move, and copy but cannot remove anything, leaving obvious dead ends in workflows. This is a significant gap that will cause agent failures when cleanup is needed.