gsc-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to gsc-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Google Search Console API. Enables search performance analytics, sitemap management, URL index inspection, and property management through natural language.1896 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Google Search Console, enabling querying site performance, URL inspection, sitemaps, and more via typed tools with OAuth authentication.1,444 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Google Search Console, enabling chat-based queries about search performance, sitemaps, and URL indexing status via natural language.7139 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceSelf-hosted Google Search Console MCP server that lets ChatGPT, Claude, or other MCP clients query GSC data in natural language. It exposes tools to list sites, query Search Analytics, inspect URLs, and list sitemaps.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Google Search Console, enabling querying search analytics, URL inspection, sitemap management, and more via natural language.8,656 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for querying Google Search Console data — search analytics, URL inspection, sitemap monitoring, and more — read-only tools for any MCP-compatible AI client.758 PyPIApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions, but identify_quick_wins and get_ctr_optimization_report both describe the same high-impressions/low-CTR quick-win use case, creating selection ambiguity. Additionally, analyze_site_health and crawl_error_summary both touch on indexing/crawl health, which may confuse an agent.
The vast majority of tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (list_properties, add_site, submit_sitemap, delete_site). A few names like crawl_error_summary and property_migration_checklist deviate from this pattern, but they are still readable and do not disrupt the overall convention.
At 22 tools, this is in the 'heavy' range (16-25), though the Google Search Console domain legitimately spans property management, search analytics, URL inspection, sitemaps, and crawling health. Each tool occupies a mostly distinct niche, so the count is defensible but slightly higher than ideal.
The set covers the major GSC workflows: property CRUD, search analytics reporting with comparisons and filters, URL inspection, sitemap management, and crawl error summaries. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no detailed per-URL crawl error listing or permission management), but agents can complete common tasks without dead ends.