send_draft
Send a draft email to subscribers immediately. Use the draft ID to trigger the send.
Instructions
Send a draft email immediately to subscribers
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The draft email ID to send |
Send a draft email to subscribers immediately. Use the draft ID to trigger the send.
Send a draft email immediately to subscribers
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The draft email ID to send |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose side effects, permissions, reversibility, or what happens to the draft after sending. For a mutating operation, this is a significant gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant words; perfect for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple single-param structure, the description is mostly complete but lacks behavioral details like irreversible consequences or subscriber scope confirmation; no annotations or output schema to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description covers the param at 100%, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Specific verb 'Send' + resource 'draft email' + recipient 'subscribers' and temporal scope 'immediately' clearly differentiates from sibling schedule_draft.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The word 'immediately' provides clear context for when to use (immediate send) vs schedule_draft, but no explicit alternatives or exclusions are stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dgalarza/buttondown-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server