Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to clawops

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Self-hosted PaaS MCP server providing a write-capable control plane with over 100 tools to deploy, roll back, manage domains, and administer infrastructure, while ensuring agent permissions never exceed human RBAC.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Securely inspect and operate self-hosted infrastructure including Linux host health, Docker containers and logs, Dokploy deployments, and OCI resources through a narrowly scoped, auditable MCP gateway.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables Claude to manage infrastructure across Kubernetes, Docker, Prometheus, and Terraform through natural language. It provides over 42 specialized tools with a safety-first design, including risk-based command classification and audit logging.
      43
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An AI-DevOps MCP server that gives LLMs read-only-by-default access to Kubernetes clusters, Prometheus metrics, and GitHub Actions, enabling natural language queries about infrastructure status and safe write operations with previews.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables infrastructure operations including provisioning, configuration, monitoring, compliance auditing, and auto-remediation through natural language, using Terraform and Ansible tools exposed over MCP.
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.7/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping or unclear purposes, such as clawops_status, clawops_monitor, clawops_doctor, and clawops_task_status, which all seem related to checking system state. Without descriptions, it's difficult for an agent to distinguish between these tools, leading to likely misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow a consistent pattern with the 'clawops_' prefix and snake_case naming (e.g., clawops_config_get, clawops_config_set). However, verb usage varies (status, plan, destroy, harden) and some names like 'clawops_doctor' or 'clawops_up' are less conventional, but the overall pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server exposes 19 tools, which falls into the 'heavy' range (16-25). While the breadth suggests a comprehensive DevOps operations tool, the count feels slightly over-scoped for a single server, though it's not extreme enough to be detrimental.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers a wide range of operations: configuration management (get/set/unset/validate), lifecycle (plan/apply/destroy/up), monitoring (status/doctor/logs_tail/monitor), workflows (deploy_app/recover), and infrastructure control (stacks, agents, gateway). While some operations like a dedicated 'delete' or 'list' might be missing, the core workflows appear well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive