Skip to main content
Glama
dfrancislyondflabc-tech

recall-mcp

by dfrancislyondflabc-tech
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to recall-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ai-lab

      bunlongheng
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to search and retrieve from a local knowledge base of markdown notes using hybrid semantic+keyword search, keeping data entirely offline.
      10 npm
      MIT

    • vault-mcp-server

      thebackpackdevorg
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Turns any folder of Markdown files into a searchable, structured knowledge base for Claude Code, enabling persistent memory across sessions via tools like list, read, write, edit, search, and summarize.
      MIT

    • Hybrid RAG Project MCP Server

      gwyer
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to perform hybrid search across local documents by combining semantic vector retrieval and BM25 keyword matching for optimal context recovery. It supports multiple file formats including PDF, CSV, and Markdown, leveraging local Ollama models for private and efficient document querying.
      4
      MIT

    • obsidian-knowledge-mcp

      nekottyo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables hybrid vector-BM25 search and retrieval of Obsidian vault knowledge notes, allowing AI assistants like Claude to efficiently access relevant chunks without full file reads.
      MIT

    • obsidian-rag

      Amanaakash
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search and reading of Obsidian Markdown notes through read-only MCP tools, allowing Claude to retrieve relevant passages from a local vault.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context All Your Agents Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and hold it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one exposed tool, there is no inter-tool ambiguity. The internal actions—search, latest, thread, verify, import, capture, get, neighbors, index—are each clearly separated by purpose, so an agent can reliably select among them. This is trivially unambiguous as a tool set.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The single tool name 'memory' is a generic noun rather than a clear verb_noun or action-oriented name, and it provides no observable naming pattern. Internally, action names mix styles such as 'latest' and 'search' with 'index_status' and 'probe_status', so consistency is only fair.

    Tool Count2/5

    One tool for a rich recall domain is too few; all functionality is crammed into a single monolithic memory command with many sub-actions. This makes the surface look thinner than it is and forces agents to parse a massive description. A small set of focused tools would be more appropriate for the scope.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool covers search, chronological state queries, thread following, git verification, import, capture, indexing, tier management, library scoping, and staleness detection—a comprehensive memory lifecycle. It even anticipates failure modes like stale indexes and async rebuilds. No obvious retrieval or state-checking gap remains.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources