Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agentic-recall

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to retrieve relevant memories from a folder of markdown files using hybrid search (BM25F, dense embeddings, phrase proximity) and to explicitly report when no strong match exists instead of guessing.
      1
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides local-first, cross-session memory for Claude Code, enabling semantic search across past sessions to retrieve procedures, decisions, or answers without exposing secrets.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to automatically recall and write shared long-term memories stored as plain Markdown, combining BM25, vector, and link-graph hybrid search so relevant notes are injected on every prompt. Memories persist across sessions, projects, and machines, with status tracking for pending and resolved items plus optional end-of-session curation.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to use local markdown notes as persistent, searchable memory with hybrid recall, episodic memory, note-graph traversal, design memory, and optional cloud sync.
      136 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have mutually exclusive purposes: memory is read-only retrieval with many actions, while memory_write is exclusively for writes (import, capture, index, tier changes). There is no overlap in functionality, so an agent can unambiguously choose based on whether it needs to read or write.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names share the 'memory' prefix, with '_write' clearly marking the write operation. This is a simple, predictable convention that mirrors the underlying domain, and there are no mixed naming styles or vague verbs.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the surface feels thin at first glance, but the memory tool consolidates a large set of read actions (search, latest, sessions, thread, verify, get, neighbors, index_status, probe_status) into one interface. This is a borderline case — the count is low, but the scope is narrow enough that a read/write pair is reasonable.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full memory lifecycle: comprehensive reads (search, get, thread, verify, sessions, neighbors, freshness), writes (import, capture, index, demote/promote), and administrative operations (index_status, probe_status). The deliberate absence of deletion is clearly documented and does not create a dead end, as content is designed to persist.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues