Skip to main content
Glama

list_catalogs

Lists loaded OSCAL Catalogs with UUID, title, child count, and size so you can choose a query value for catalog queries. Results are paged.

Instructions

List loaded OSCAL Catalogs with UUID, title, child count, and size. Use when picking a query_value for query_catalog. Results are paged.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_catalogs"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum items per page, 1-100.
offsetNoZero-based index of the first item.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.7.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"Maximum items per page, 1-100."
    • addedInput schema / properties / offset / description
      Added value: +"Zero-based index of the first item."
  2. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full load: 'List' implies a safe read, it discloses what each entry contains, and it notes 'Results are paged', which is the key behavioral trait. It doesn't mention auth requirements, default/maximum page size, total-count availability, or sort order, so the transparency is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the resource and returned fields, followed by the routing hint and the paging note. No filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so the description's enumeration of returned fields does the necessary work, and paging is flagged. It stops short of explaining what 'child count' or 'size' mean, how to page through all results, or whether a total is available, which an agent paginating would want.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters (limit 1-100, zero-based offset) are fully documented in the schema. The description only echoes paging behavior without adding syntax or constraints beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List loaded OSCAL Catalogs') and enumerates the fields it returns (UUID, title, child count, size), which distinguishes it from query_catalog and from the many sibling list_* tools for SSPS, profiles, and POAMs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says to use it when picking a query_value for query_catalog, giving a concrete selection rule tied to a named sibling. It doesn't state when to avoid it (e.g., if you already have a UUID) or note that the other query_* tools follow the same pattern, but the routing guidance is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.