Skip to main content
Glama
deyikong

SendGrid MCP Server

by deyikong

List All Contacts

list_contacts
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve a quick sample of up to 50 recently added or updated contacts from SendGrid, sorted by email address, with no parameters required.

Instructions

List up to 50 of your most recently uploaded/updated contacts, sorted by email address. This endpoint takes no parameters — SendGrid deprecated pagination here; use search_contacts or export for anything beyond a quick sample.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.1.1
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
    • removedInput schema / properties / page_size
      Removed value: -{
      -  "default": 100,
      -  "description": "Number of contacts to return (max 1000)",
      -  "type": "number"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / page_token
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Token for pagination",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
  2. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.0.0
    • addedInput schema / $schema
      Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  3. First observed

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already convey readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior; the description adds the 50-contact cap, recency selection, sort order, and deprecation of pagination. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with the core behavior front-loaded and the limitation/alternative in the second sentence. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter read-only list tool with no output schema, the description gives the essential usage constraints and routes to alternatives. Nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With an empty input schema, the baseline is 4, and the description goes further by stating the endpoint truly takes no parameters and explaining why (SendGrid deprecated pagination). This prevents an agent from looking for hidden pagination/query parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('List') and resource ('contacts') with precise constraints: up to 50, most recently uploaded/updated, sorted by email address. This distinguishes it from siblings like list_email_lists, list_segments, and search_contacts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicity says the endpoint takes no parameters and that SendGrid deprecated pagination, and directs the agent to use search_contacts or export for anything beyond a quick sample. This gives clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.