delete_note

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly states 'ação irreversível' (irreversible action), which is a key behavioral trait. No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. Lacks details on side effects like backlinks.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence plus a short warning; no wasted words. Efficiently conveys essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a delete operation with required confirmation parameter. However, lacks details on repercussions (e.g., broken links, cascading deletions) that would fully inform an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for both parameters. The description does not add significant extra meaning beyond the schema, but the warning reinforces the confirm parameter's necessity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Deleta' (deletes) and the resource 'nota' (note), and distinguishes it from sibling tools like read_note, create_note, etc. The irreversibility warning adds context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The irreversibility warning implies careful use, but no prerequisites or when-not-to-use are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.