No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 24 tools
Most tools have clear boundaries: jobs, candidates, applications, interviews, archive reasons, and API docs are separated by verb and object. Some overlap exists (get_application_details includes feedback, making get_feedback partly redundant; list_applications and list_candidates_for_job both return pipeline lists), but descriptions usually steer the agent to the right tool.
The set consistently uses ashby_ + snake_case + verb_noun naming (list_jobs, get_candidate, move_application_stage). Minor deviations like bulk_archive (missing its object) and the generic call_api/get_api_docs pair keep it from being a perfect 5.
24 tools is at the heavy end of the 16-25 range. The breadth is understandable for an ATS, but the count is inflated by near-duplicates (archive_application vs bulk_archive, get_feedback vs get_application_details) and two meta-tools, so the set could be tightened.
Core recruiting workflows are covered: listing jobs, sourcing candidates, reading resumes/notes/form responses, moving stages, archiving, and reviewing feedback. Missing pieces like candidate updates, offer management, and interview scheduling are left to ashby_call_api, which prevents hard dead ends though it pushes work onto the agent.