ews-outlook-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ews-outlook-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects Claude to a personal Microsoft Outlook mailbox via Microsoft Graph, providing tools for mail, calendar, contacts, tasks, and settings with a strong security model.194 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables Claude to manage Outlook emails, including reading, sending, organizing, drafting, and bulk operations via Microsoft Graph API.15 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that connects Claude Desktop to a personal Hotmail/Outlook.com mailbox via Microsoft Graph API, enabling email management, rule handling, and composing messages.25MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server for Claude that reads Outlook emails its attachments through the Microsoft Graph API.618MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Claude to access Outlook data via Microsoft Graph API20194 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Python-based MCP server for Microsoft Outlook integration using Microsoft Graph API, enabling email reading/sending, calendar management, and contact operations through Claude Desktop.1-
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource/action combination: email operations (list, search, get, send, reply, forward, move, flag) are clearly separated from calendar operations (list, create, update, delete, accept, decline, add_attendee) and contact resolution. No two tools have overlapping or ambiguous purposes.
The vast majority of tools follow the ews_verb_noun pattern consistently (e.g., ews_list_inbox, ews_create_event, ews_forward_message). The only deviation is ews_today_summary, which lacks a verb and breaks the otherwise uniform convention.
At 18 tools, the set is slightly above the typical well-scoped range, but the count is justified by covering two major Outlook domains (email and calendar) plus contacts. Each tool has a clear role, so the size feels reasonable rather than bloated.
Core workflows for email (list, read, send, reply, forward, move, flag) and calendar (list, create, update, delete, accept/decline invitations, add attendees) are covered. Notable gaps include lack of email deletion and no dedicated get-event tool, but these are workaroundable via list and update/delete.