Skip to main content
Glama
devrandom

mcp-fstools

by devrandom

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-fstools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides hashline-based file editing using line-addressed edits and content hashes for integrity verification. It enables LLMs to perform precise file modifications while ensuring edits are rejected if the file content has changed since the last read.
      30 npm
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes hash-anchored file edits to MCP-compatible AI coding agents, enabling safe read and write operations with stale edit detection.
      1
      56 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read, replace, and write files through line-range-scoped, byte-literal edits that preserve CRLF/LF line endings and indentation, reject ambiguous matches, and perform atomic writes. It returns the actual current range content and a self-correction hint on mismatch, eliminating 'Could not find oldString' failures in MCP clients like opencode and Claude Desktop.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Snapshot-based file editing for AI agents. Enables safe file edits by sending only new content against immutable, content-addressed snapshots with 3-way merging and ambiguity protection.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables reading, creating, and editing files on the local filesystem through operations like view, create, string replacement, and line insertion.
      128 npm
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: read retrieves content, edit modifies parts, write overwrites entirely. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names are single-word verbs, simple and consistent. No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is minimal but appropriate for a focused file editing server. Each tool earns its place, though more tools could be added for listing or deletion.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set lacks fundamental file operations like delete, rename, list, or search. For a general file system server, this is a significant gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues