Skip to main content
Glama
devrandom

mcp-fstools

by devrandom
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-fstools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-hashline-edit-server

      Submersible
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides hashline-based file editing using line-addressed edits and content hashes for integrity verification. It enables LLMs to perform precise file modifications while ensuring edits are rejected if the file content has changed since the last read.
      7 npm
      9
      MIT

    • hledit-mcp

      dabito
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes hash-anchored file edits to MCP-compatible AI coding agents, enabling safe read and write operations with stale edit detection.
      1
      51 npm
      1
      MIT

    • snapedit

      rianprei
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Snapshot-based file editing for AI agents. Enables safe file edits by sending only new content against immutable, content-addressed snapshots with 3-way merging and ambiguity protection.
      1
      MIT

    • Filesystem MCP

      domdomegg
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables reading, creating, and editing files on the local filesystem through operations like view, create, string replacement, and line insertion.
      80 npm
      3
      MIT

    • Files MCP Server

      iceener
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to safely explore directories, read files, search content by pattern or filename, and edit files with checksum verification and dry-run preview within sandboxed filesystem access.
      6 npm
      75
      ISC
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: read retrieves content, edit modifies parts, write overwrites entirely. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names are single-word verbs, simple and consistent. No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is minimal but appropriate for a focused file editing server. Each tool earns its place, though more tools could be added for listing or deletion.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set lacks fundamental file operations like delete, rename, list, or search. For a general file system server, this is a significant gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources