Skip to main content
Glama
devpatel25

resumeai-mcp

by devpatel25

Related Servers

Alternatives to resumeai-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes a structured professional resume as a set of AI-queryable tools, enabling AI clients like Claude Desktop to query summary, experience, skills, projects, and tailor resumes to job descriptions.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes a curriculum vitae hosted on a backend REST API to AI assistants over stdio, letting them retrieve the full CV, list and fetch individual sections, and search for terms like technologies or companies. It also provides the full CV as attachable context and a prompt that compares the CV against a job description to suggest improvements.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code and OpenAI Codex CLI to act as bidirectional partners by letting each ask the other for code review, explanations, planning, performance analysis, and implementation help. It also provides background job tools for starting, observing, waiting on, and cancelling delegated tasks.
      6
      704 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables parsing a master resume, analyzing job descriptions for ATS/match scores, generating truthful tailored resumes, tracking applications, and producing PDF reports through Claude Desktop.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Desktop or compatible editors to run local, privacy-first job-search workflows including resume generation and STAR polishing, JD matching, GitHub project recommendations, mock interviews, and application tracking. It exposes these capabilities as callable tools through the Model Context Protocol.
      7
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct step in the scan lifecycle: auth_status (auth check), list_scans (history), start_scan (create), get_scan_status (poll), get_scan_feedback (results), delete_scan (remove). The boundaries between polling status, retrieving feedback, and starting a scan are clear and non-overlapping.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (list_scans, start_scan, get_scan_status, get_scan_feedback, delete_scan). auth_status deviates slightly by leading with a noun-like token rather than an explicit verb, but it remains readable and consistent with the scan-status naming family.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a scan-and-feedback workflow, with each tool earning its place across auth, listing, creation, polling, results, and deletion. Nothing feels padded or redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: authentication, listing, starting, polling, fetching feedback, and deletion. Minor gaps exist (no explicit cancel/abort for an in-flight scan or resume-management operation), but these are workable given the one-scan-in-flight constraint and idempotent start.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive