Skip to main content
Glama
devpatel25

resumeai-mcp

by devpatel25

Related Servers

Alternatives to resumeai-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes a structured professional resume as a set of AI-queryable tools, enabling AI clients like Claude Desktop to query summary, experience, skills, projects, and tailor resumes to job descriptions.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables parsing a master resume, analyzing job descriptions for ATS/match scores, generating truthful tailored resumes, tracking applications, and producing PDF reports through Claude Desktop.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Desktop or compatible editors to run local, privacy-first job-search workflows including resume generation and STAR polishing, JD matching, GitHub project recommendations, mock interviews, and application tracking. It exposes these capabilities as callable tools through the Model Context Protocol.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to parse CVs, search job boards (Remotive, Arbeitnow, Adzuna, Greenhouse/Lever), tailor resumes and cover letters, and prepare application packages with direct apply links—without ever auto-submitting. It runs 100% locally and free, storing jobs and applications as JSON files.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local ATS-style resume scanning against job postings, providing match rates, missing keywords, and edit suggestions through Claude Desktop.
      5
      -

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct step in the scan lifecycle: auth_status (auth check), list_scans (history), start_scan (create), get_scan_status (poll), get_scan_feedback (results), delete_scan (remove). The boundaries between polling status, retrieving feedback, and starting a scan are clear and non-overlapping.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (list_scans, start_scan, get_scan_status, get_scan_feedback, delete_scan). auth_status deviates slightly by leading with a noun-like token rather than an explicit verb, but it remains readable and consistent with the scan-status naming family.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a scan-and-feedback workflow, with each tool earning its place across auth, listing, creation, polling, results, and deletion. Nothing feels padded or redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: authentication, listing, starting, polling, fetching feedback, and deletion. Minor gaps exist (no explicit cancel/abort for an in-flight scan or resume-management operation), but these are workable given the one-scan-in-flight constraint and idempotent start.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues