MotionMCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to MotionMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server bridges Motion's API with LLMs like Claude and ChatGPT via the Model Context Protocol, so you can manage tasks, search projects, check your schedule, and more — all through natural conversation.10Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI assistants full access to the Motion task and project management API, enabling task, project, and schedule management.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceBridges Motion's API with LLMs via the Model Context Protocol, so you can manage tasks, search projects, check your schedule, and more — all through natural conversation.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn open-source MCP server enabling AI assistants to interact with the Motion API for intelligent task and project management.5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural language management of Motion tasks, projects, schedules, and more via the Model Context Protocol, integrating with LLMs like Claude and ChatGPT.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceBridges Motion's API with LLMs like Claude and ChatGPT via the Model Context Protocol, enabling task management, project search, schedule viewing, and more through natural conversation.10Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct Motion resource (tasks, projects, workspaces, users, search, comments, custom fields, recurring tasks, schedules, statuses), with operations namespaced inside each tool. There is no meaningful overlap that would cause misselection; even search vs. list is clearly separated by intent.
All tool names follow a consistent motion_<resource> snake_case pattern. The convention is uniform across all 10 tools, making the set predictable and easy to scan.
10 tools map cleanly to the major Motion API resource groups. The count is well within the ideal 3–15 range, and each tool covers a distinct area without redundant wrappers.
Tasks are thoroughly covered (create, list, get, update, delete, move, unassign, list all uncompleted), but projects only support create/list/get with no update or delete, and recurring tasks plus custom fields lack update operations. These are notable lifecycle gaps that could force agents to work around missing operations.