estado

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool returns both state and a replayable log, hinting at a read-only nature. However, it does not mention response size limits, potential replayability constraints, or side effects, leaving some behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys the core function. It is front-loaded with the primary output (current state) followed by the log, minimizing redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has an output schema, the return format is covered structurally. The tool is relatively simple with one required parameter, but the description lacks context on when to choose this over sibling tools like 'ultimos_eventos' or 'reproducir_sesion', leaving the agent to guess. Overall, it is minimally adequate for the complexity level.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not elaborate on the 'sesion_id' parameter (e.g., format, examples, or how to obtain it). The schema defines it as a required string with no further detail, and the description adds no semantic value to help the agent provide a correct value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool provides the current session state and the complete event log (replayable). The verb 'Estado actual de la sesion mas el log completo' is specific enough to distinguish from siblings like 'ultimos_eventos' (last events) or 'reproducir_sesion' (replay session), though it lacks explicit contrast.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'ultimos_eventos' for a short event list or 'reproducir_sesion' for replay. The description does not mention prerequisites, such as whether the session must be active, nor does it specify when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.