Playwright MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Playwright MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to drive a full Chromium desktop browser over MCP by reading structured accessibility-tree snapshots with stable element refs and token-saving incremental updates, then navigating, clicking, typing, selecting, scrolling, and extracting page text. It also supports tab management, console logs, screenshots, and HTTP traffic capture with request/response bodies and HAR export for API inspection.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceProvides browser automation capabilities so LLMs can interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots, without needing screenshots or vision models. It offers fast, lightweight, and deterministic tool application for driving browsers via structured data.2510,630,264 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceBrowser automation MCP server that uses a real browser to give agents eyes and hands—open pages, click, fill, screenshot, and run scripts via accessibility-tree snapshots.2226 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to drive a real Chromium browser over MCP using genuine mouse, keyboard, and wheel input, with accessibility snapshots, diffs, network logs, forked sessions, and replayable traces for bug bounty hunting.20MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI tools to drive a hosted headless Chromium browser over HTTP, allowing LLMs to navigate, click, type, and read web pages through accessibility snapshots.2310,630,264 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI agents drive the locally installed Chrome or Edge, opening pages, taking compact accessibility-tree snapshots with @e references, and clicking, typing, scrolling, or capturing screenshots. It also exposes multi-account and cross-channel tab switching, tab sync rules, and ad-block/perf statistics.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct browser-automation purposes, but a few boundaries blur: browser_close vs. browser_tabs can both close tabs, and browser_evaluate vs. browser_run_code_unsafe both execute code in different contexts. The descriptions usually clarify these differences, though an agent may still hesitate in edge cases.
All tool names use a consistent browser_ prefix followed by snake_case verbs or noun phrases. The pattern is predictable throughout the set.
25 tools is at the heavy end for a browser automation server; while most operations are genuinely useful, the surface feels granular and borderline overloaded. A more compact set could combine several low-level controls without losing capability.
The surface covers navigation, interaction, forms, screenshots, snapshots, tabs, dialogs, uploads, network/console inspection, and code execution. Minor gaps exist, such as explicit forward navigation/reload and cookie/storage management, but agents can often work around them with evaluate or run_code_unsafe.