Skip to main content
Glama
detonnate

careerproof-mcp

by detonnate

Related Servers

Alternatives to careerproof-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables job seekers to run the entire job-search workflow through natural-language chat in MCP clients: mining verifiable strengths via an evidence-to-role-signal chain, scoring resumes against job descriptions, tailoring rewrites, ATS keyword checks, interview question banks and mock interviews, plus application tracking and review. All data stays on the local machine, and the server refuses to store strengths or fabricate content that lacks supporting evidence.
      40
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients to analyse job postings, tailor resumes from an evidence-labelled profile, validate every claim against that profile, and track applications, all through deterministic MCP tools.
      7
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to audit public GitHub repositories and receive structured launch-readiness reports with evidence-backed findings, reproducible scoring, and ready-to-paste launch copy.
      188 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to analyze resumes for ATS compatibility, parse job descriptions, get optimization and roast-style critiques, and generate tailored resumes with shareable preview links.
      6
      0
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: evidence ingestion (profile, repository, manual), analysis (job description, matching, gaps, scoring), generation (STAR, questions), and export. Potential confusion between find_evidence, find_evidence_gaps, and match_requirements is resolved by descriptions specifying search vs. gap-only vs. scoring. No two tools appear interchangeable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 11 tools use a consistent `careerproof_` prefix followed by snake_case verb_noun construction (add_, index_, score_, export_, find_, analyse_, match_, generate_). The pattern is predictable and readable. Only minor variance is verb choice (analyse vs. analyze) but not inconsistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is well-scoped for a career-evidence preparation server, covering ingestion, analysis, generation, and export without obvious bloat. Each tool earns its place by handling a distinct workflow step. Falls squarely within the ideal 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle is covered: ingest evidence (CV, repo, manual), analyze job requirements, match against evidence, identify gaps, generate answers/questions, and export a pack. Minor gaps exist for updating/deleting evidence items or profiles, but these are not critical for the stated prep workflow. Agent can work around via re-ingestion or new evidence.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues