Skip to main content
Glama
detonnate

careerproof-mcp

by detonnate
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to careerproof-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • career-agent-mcp

      leelakrishna288
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients to analyse job postings, tailor resumes from an evidence-labelled profile, validate every claim against that profile, and track applications, all through deterministic MCP tools.
      7
      Apache 2.0

    • matchcv-mcp

      18boys
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to analyze resumes for ATS compatibility, parse job descriptions, get optimization and roast-style critiques, and generate tailored resumes with shareable preview links.
      6
      41 npm
      MIT

    • github-repo-intel-mcp

      heisencodex-jpg
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding agents with structured intelligence about any GitHub repository including overview, PRs, contributors, hot files, CI status, and dependencies via a hosted MCP endpoint.
      41 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: evidence ingestion (profile, repository, manual), analysis (job description, matching, gaps, scoring), generation (STAR, questions), and export. Potential confusion between find_evidence, find_evidence_gaps, and match_requirements is resolved by descriptions specifying search vs. gap-only vs. scoring. No two tools appear interchangeable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 11 tools use a consistent `careerproof_` prefix followed by snake_case verb_noun construction (add_, index_, score_, export_, find_, analyse_, match_, generate_). The pattern is predictable and readable. Only minor variance is verb choice (analyse vs. analyze) but not inconsistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is well-scoped for a career-evidence preparation server, covering ingestion, analysis, generation, and export without obvious bloat. Each tool earns its place by handling a distinct workflow step. Falls squarely within the ideal 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle is covered: ingest evidence (CV, repo, manual), analyze job requirements, match against evidence, identify gaps, generate answers/questions, and export a pack. Minor gaps exist for updating/deleting evidence items or profiles, but these are not critical for the stated prep workflow. Agent can work around via re-ingestion or new evidence.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources