careerproof-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to careerproof-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables job seekers to run the entire job-search workflow through natural-language chat in MCP clients: mining verifiable strengths via an evidence-to-role-signal chain, scoring resumes against job descriptions, tailoring rewrites, ATS keyword checks, interview question banks and mock interviews, plus application tracking and review. All data stays on the local machine, and the server refuses to store strengths or fabricate content that lacks supporting evidence.40MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLM clients to analyse job postings, tailor resumes from an evidence-labelled profile, validate every claim against that profile, and track applications, all through deterministic MCP tools.7Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables interview preparation by analyzing resumes and job descriptions, generating role-specific questions, and evaluating answers using MCP tools integrated with an OpenAI agent.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to audit public GitHub repositories and receive structured launch-readiness reports with evidence-backed findings, reproducible scoring, and ready-to-paste launch copy.188 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables JD-aware resume matching through MCP tools, providing deterministic scoring, gap analysis, bullet rewrites, and tailored cover letter generation.13 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to analyze resumes for ATS compatibility, parse job descriptions, get optimization and roast-style critiques, and generate tailored resumes with shareable preview links.60MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct role: evidence ingestion (profile, repository, manual), analysis (job description, matching, gaps, scoring), generation (STAR, questions), and export. Potential confusion between find_evidence, find_evidence_gaps, and match_requirements is resolved by descriptions specifying search vs. gap-only vs. scoring. No two tools appear interchangeable.
All 11 tools use a consistent `careerproof_` prefix followed by snake_case verb_noun construction (add_, index_, score_, export_, find_, analyse_, match_, generate_). The pattern is predictable and readable. Only minor variance is verb choice (analyse vs. analyze) but not inconsistent.
11 tools is well-scoped for a career-evidence preparation server, covering ingestion, analysis, generation, and export without obvious bloat. Each tool earns its place by handling a distinct workflow step. Falls squarely within the ideal 3-15 range.
Core lifecycle is covered: ingest evidence (CV, repo, manual), analyze job requirements, match against evidence, identify gaps, generate answers/questions, and export a pack. Minor gaps exist for updating/deleting evidence items or profiles, but these are not critical for the stated prep workflow. Agent can work around via re-ingestion or new evidence.