spm-search-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to spm-search-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that indexes a repository locally and provides keyword, semantic, hybrid, and SQL search tools, enabling coding agents to answer questions about the codebase efficiently without reading files one by one.69 npm31Apache 2.0

GitHitsofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to search and access open-source code, documentation, and package information via a local MCP server.2,323 npm107Apache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that indexes reference repositories and provides tools for AI coding agents to retrieve lossless code context, enabling reasoning over codebases larger than the agent's context window.82Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to search code, find files, and read files in a codebase at lightning speed using ripgrep.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server providing web search, image search, and page scraping tools to LLMs without requiring API keys.312MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA codemode MCP server for fetching and querying dependency source code from npm, PyPI, crates.io, and GitHub. It allows agents to execute server-side JavaScript for context-efficient searching and browsing of large codebases without overwhelming the LLM's context window.122 npm40MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a distinct and non-overlapping purpose: search_swift_packages finds packages, get_package_readme fetches details for a specific package, and list_search_filters provides metadata about valid search parameters. There is no ambiguity about which tool to use for each task.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: search_swift_packages, get_package_readme, and list_search_filters. The naming is predictable and clearly indicates each tool's function.
Three tools is appropriate for the server's purpose of searching and exploring Swift packages, covering search, detail retrieval, and filter discovery. However, it feels slightly minimal—adding a tool for getting package metadata or dependencies could enhance completeness.
The tools cover the core workflow of searching for Swift packages, viewing filters, and reading READMEs, with no dead ends. A minor gap exists in lacking direct access to package metadata like versions or dependencies, but agents can work around this using the provided tools effectively.