DeSo MCP Server
OfficialServer Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| deso_api_explorerC | Comprehensive DeSo API explorer with backend implementation details and deso-js SDK integration |
| deso_js_guideC | Complete guide to using the deso-js SDK with setup, authentication, and transactions |
| generate_deso_codeB | Generate comprehensive code examples for DeSo operations using deso-js SDK |
| explain_deso_architectureC | Explain DeSo architecture, flows, and integration patterns |
| repository_searchC | Search for documents in the DeSo repository |
| read_repository_documentB | Read a specific document from the DeSo repository |
| deso_debugging_guideC | Comprehensive debugging guide for common DeSo integration issues with solutions |
| deso_implementation_patternsC | Best practices and implementation patterns learned from deso-chat and real debugging |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
The tools have some overlap in purpose, particularly between deso_api_explorer, deso_js_guide, and generate_deso_code, which all involve code/API guidance, but their descriptions help differentiate them. However, tools like deso_debugging_guide and deso_implementation_patterns could be confused as they both address integration issues and best practices, creating ambiguity in selection.
Most tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with a 'deso_' prefix, such as deso_api_explorer and deso_js_guide, which aids readability. However, there are minor deviations like read_repository_document and repository_search, which use a different naming style without the prefix, slightly breaking the pattern but not severely impacting usability.
With 8 tools, the count is well-scoped for a server focused on DeSo integration, documentation, and code generation. Each tool appears to serve a distinct educational or operational purpose, avoiding bloat while covering key aspects like API exploration, debugging, and repository access, making the set manageable and purposeful.
The tool set covers documentation, guidance, and repository operations well, but there are notable gaps in direct DeSo API interactions, such as creating or updating blockchain transactions or user data. While tools like generate_deso_code and deso_js_guide provide code examples, they lack actual execution capabilities, which limits the server's operational completeness for real-time integration tasks.