Skip to main content
Glama
desikai-lab

Marrow

by desikai-lab
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Marrow

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Tages

      ryantlee25-droid
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to maintain persistent, cross-session memory of codebase architecture, naming conventions, and decisions through MCP tools. Eliminates repetitive project re-explanation by automatically injecting stored context into every session with local-first SQLite storage and optional team sharing capabilities.
      4
      MIT

    • onememory

      vramasamye
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and assistants to share a local-first, token-efficient persistent memory layer across MCP-compatible runtimes, storing typed project facts, decisions, failures, and solutions with temporal validity. It supports offline use and Postgres-compatible storage, so agents can retrieve relevant context without re-embedding entire repositories.
      Apache 2.0

    • 0f

      zanarellidev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to share a persistent local-first memory hub, storing and recalling architectural decisions and context across different tools via MCP, so users can switch assistants without losing context.
      Apache 2.0

    • Logica Context

      Rovemark
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides persistent, cross-session memory and team knowledge sharing for AI development workflows. It enables project DNA scanning, semantic search, context budgeting, and git-aware indexing to prevent AI context loss between sessions.
      9 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, reinforced by explicit 'Do NOT use...' guidance that steers agents to the correct tool for each operation. Categories (artifact, code, task, session, project, build, history) are well-separated, and even similar tools like semantic_search vs search_project_artifacts are differentiated by semantic vs full-text search.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_project_artifacts, save_project_artifacts, get_task_details, run_project_build). The few exceptions like semantic_search still fit the pattern as a search operation, and there is no mixing of naming conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 24 tools, the count is on the heavier side but justified by the server's broad scope covering artifacts, code, tasks, sessions, projects, builds, and history. Each tool earns its place; the count feels comprehensive rather than bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides full lifecycle coverage for its domain: artifact CRUD plus move/delete/restore/history, code search and reading, task management from creation to completion, session context retrieval, project initialization and listing, and build execution. No obvious gaps that would cause agent failures.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources