meta-data-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to meta-data-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server that makes official UAE open data queryable through natural language, offering tools for source discovery, dataset search, spatial joins, and intelligence recipes.55 npmMIT

ReefAPI MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceOne MCP server providing access to 160+ live web data APIs (search, social media, e-commerce, real estate, jobs, travel, news, finance, and more) using dynamic discovery via 4 generic tools to avoid the agent's tool limit.53MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects to open data portals like CKAN and Socrata, enabling natural language querying of datasets via Claude.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAggregates 17 free, keyless research sources into a single MCP server, enabling unified search for papers, code, models, trends, standards, and electronic components with deduplicated results.8MIT

fd-daas-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConsolidated MCP server exposing 161 tools across 9 groups to manage a layered data platform (financial, economic, statistical) backed by a single SQLite file, with data fetching delegated to an upstream semantic fetcher.MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA meta-MCP server that acts as a universal gateway, allowing users to discover and execute tools from thousands of other MCP servers through semantic search. It dynamically loads servers on demand and provides standardized functions for searching, discovering, and running tools across the entire MCP ecosystem.6-
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Every tool serves a distinct purpose: provider discovery vs activation vs health, plugin drafting vs creation, federated query vs comparison. Even the two federate tools are clearly separated by output (merged series vs coverage matrix). No two tools appear to duplicate each other.
The vast majority follow the 'opendata_<resource>_<verb>' pattern (e.g., providers_list, plugins_create, health_snapshot). However, three tools deviate with verb-object order (federate_query, federate_compare, explain_choice), which is a minor inconsistency in an otherwise readable and predictable scheme.
15 tools is at the upper edge of the ideal range but perfectly appropriate for the server's scope: it manages providers, plugins, health monitoring, federation, and vocabulary. Each tool earns its place with a clear role, and none feel redundant or excessive.
The core workflows are well covered: discover providers, activate/deactivate, run federated queries, and create new plugins. The only minor gaps are the absence of an explicit update/delete lifecycle for plugins (though plugin creation is the intended path) and no unregister operation for providers beyond deactivation. These do not prevent typical agent workflows.