Get product
ametller_get_productRetrieve details for a single product by its ID.
Instructions
Get details for a single product by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| product_id | Yes | Product id, e.g. '1251' |
ametller_get_productRetrieve details for a single product by its ID.
Get details for a single product by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| product_id | Yes | Product id, e.g. '1251' |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It states it gets details but does not mention permissions, side effects, or return format. For a simple read operation, this is adequate but minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with verb and resource, no extraneous words. Extremely concise and effective.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, no output schema), the description is complete enough to understand its purpose. It could mention that it returns product details, but the name implies that.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema provides full coverage with a description and example for the single parameter. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The verb 'Get' and resource 'details for a single product by id' clearly state what the tool does. It distinguishes itself from sibling tool 'ametller_search_products' which is for searching multiple products.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when a specific product_id is known, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like search_products. No exclusion or alternative guidance provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/denya/ametller-origen-skill'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server