mikrotik-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to mikrotik-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables technicians to discover, audit, and configure MikroTik RouterOS routers over SSH, with dry-run change plans, automatic rollback, and local handling of credentials and keys.22MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables management of MikroTik routers running RouterOS 6 and 7 via SSH, Telnet, or API with automatic command adaptation. Provides over 46 MCP tools for device management, firewall, DHCP, VPN, configuration profiles, and more.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to access network device management interfaces via SSH, keeping credentials on the server side. Supports both interactive terminal sessions and command execution on devices like Huawei VRP, MikroTik, and OpenWrt.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that sends CLI commands to MikroTik RouterOS via SSH. It allows executing any RouterOS CLI command and getting text output back.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for managing MikroTik RouterOS fleets, exposing 65+ tools for system administration, interfaces, firewall, DHCP/DNS, PPP, diagnostics, and SSH command execution with KeePass-backed credentials.14 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP agents to control Keenetic routers via plain language, providing network monitoring, device management, and safe configuration changes with backup and read-only options.18289 npm27MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct role: mikrotik_exec runs commands against the router, mikrotik_search_docs searches offline documentation, and mikrotik_list_profiles discovers configured profiles. There is no overlap in purpose and the descriptions reinforce the intended call order (list_profiles → search_docs → exec).
All names share the mikrotik_ prefix and are snake_case, with search_docs and list_profiles following a clean verb_noun pattern. mikrotik_exec deviates slightly by using a bare verb with no noun object, but the convention is otherwise predictable.
Three tools is on the lean side, but this is intentional and well-scoped: a single generic exec tool subsumes arbitrary RouterOS commands, so no per-command tools are needed. Anything less (e.g. dropping the docs or profile helper) would hurt usability, so the count is justified.
The lifecycle is covered end to end: discover profiles, look up syntax, then execute (read or write) with read-only safety enforced. Minor gaps exist, such as no batch/multi-command execution or profile management, but agents can work around these using the generic exec tool.