Skip to main content
Glama
denishmistry07

mcp-graph-loop

by denishmistry07
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-graph-loop

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • agent-tasks

      keshrath
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables pipeline-driven task management for AI coding agents, with stage-gated workflows, dependency tracking, artifact versioning, and multi-agent collaboration.
      110 npm
      20
      MIT

    • agent-work-mcp

      yurikaza
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to run persistent, budgeted work sessions with dependency graphs, human decision queues, required validation, and clean handoffs for autonomous or human-in-the-loop execution.
      16
      MIT

    • tianshu-mcp

      lanlan0811
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables orchestrating external AI agents to execute development tasks with asynchronous management, automated acceptance verification, failure rework loops, and optional visual baseline validation.
      11
      524 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • OmniFix MCP Server

      Soumo04
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to execute and validate autonomous multi-agent workflows with tools for workflow execution, output validation, and execution logging, plus resources and prompts for task decomposition and error recovery.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes with clear descriptions. get_graph_state and get_phase_status both provide state information but differ in scope (overall graph vs phase-level). validate_task_loop and validate_parallel_tasks are similar but clearly distinguished by single vs parallel execution.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names consistently use snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (get_graph_state, start_task, add_task_node). Minor variation in verb choice (init vs initialize, scaffold, switch) is still predictable and does not undermine the overall pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 16 tools, the set is slightly above the comfortable range but each tool serves a distinct function in the workflow graph lifecycle. The complexity of the domain justifies the count, and there is no redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers graph initialization, task management (add/update/start/reset), validation (single/parallel), state inspection, persistence, and project switching. Missing an explicit delete_task_node or mark_completed is a minor gap, but the core workflow is covered and workarounds exist.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources