Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to yandex-workspace-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Yandex 360 organization services, currently supporting Yandex Wiki for reading, editing, and searching pages.
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A comprehensive production-ready MCP server with AI integration, plugin management, and web-based administration. Features multi-database support, RAG capabilities, SSH/SFTP access, and a built-in plugin hub for managing the MCP ecosystem.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage enterprise Active Directory environments through 45 specialized tools for users, groups, and GPOs. Its multi-client architecture allows for the secure management of multiple AD domains from a single codebase using natural language commands.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that enables AI assistants to intelligently understand, analyze, edit, navigate, and review software projects with multi-workspace support, Git integration, and semantic search.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides secure access to a serverless Markdown wiki on AWS, enabling AI assistants to read, search, and edit pages with space-level permission checks and Bedrock-powered semantic search.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Search and wiki_search overlap, with wiki_search being a subset of the generic search. Fetch could be confused with the specific getters (disk_get_metadata, wiki_get_page), though its ID-based approach differs slightly. Other tools are clearly distinct.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The disk_* and wiki_* prefixes create a consistent sub-pattern, but generic tools like search and fetch break the pattern. Naming is readable and mostly predictable, but not fully uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools covering two domains (Disk and Wiki), the count is well-scoped and appropriate for the server's purpose. Every tool has a clear role, and the number is within the ideal 3-15 range.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover search, reading, and retrieval well, but lack any write operations (create, update, delete) for both Disk and Wiki. This is a notable gap if the workspace is meant for more than read-only access, though it may be intentional for a search-focused MCP.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues