vikunja_templates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided and description omits any behavioral traits such as mutability, authentication needs, side effects (e.g., template creation), or limits. Agent has no insight beyond basic CRUD inference from subcommand enum.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is extremely concise but fails to convey necessary details for a 9-parameter, subcommand-driven tool. Under-specification outweighs brevity benefits.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and complex parameter set with subcommands, description is vastly incomplete. No information about return values, operation-specific requirements, or parameter interdependencies.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and description offers no explanation of parameters. The subcommand enum, required fields per operation, and parameter conditions (e.g., id for get/update/delete) are left entirely unspecified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description identifies the resource (task templates) and a general purpose (consistent tasks/project structures), but 'manage' is vague and does not specify the subcommand operations (CRUD, instantiate). Lacks specificity to distinguish from siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling tools like vikunja_tasks or vikunja_projects. Missing any when-to-use/when-not-to-use context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.