Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
jev-netlify-mcp

jev-netlify-mcp

by demircigoksu
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to jev-netlify-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • zerouter-mcp

      zerouter-mcpofficial

      ZerouterAI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects MCP clients such as Claude Desktop, Cursor and Claude Code to an OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible AI gateway, enabling chat with Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok and Kimi models, listing available models, and looking up per-million-token pricing. It also sends one prompt to several models in parallel and returns each answer with token usage, latency and estimated cost.
      4
      MIT

    • llm-cli-gateway

      verivus-oss
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) gateway for running Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Grok, and Mistral (Vibe) CLIs from one MCP endpoint, with durable async jobs, session continuity, cache-aware prompting, observability, and personal-appliance setup tooling. Why developers try it: one local MCP endpoint for cross-LLM validation, multi-agent coding workflows.
      65
      197 npm
      16
      MIT

    • curl-curl-cool-mcp

      dicoy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude a full HTTP client — make requests, compare environments, infer TypeScript types from live responses, and work directly with your existing Postman collections and environments.
      MIT

    • Agent Bridge

      mafazsyed
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code and Codex to delegate persistent review or isolated write-mode implementation tasks to locally installed Claude Code or Codex runtimes, then inspect progress, approve or deny individual permission requests, and continue the same native conversation. It also lists live model catalogues, lets callers follow up on saved conversations, and can run independently via its bundled CLI.
      1
      MIT

    • Railway MCP Server

      wardspan
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that gives Claude (and other MCP-compatible AI tools) full access to your Railway.app infrastructure. Deploy, manage services, check logs, configure environment variables — all through natural conversation.
      30
      2 npm
      -

    • opencode-mcp

      kobayashi0923
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects MCP clients such as Claude, Cursor, and VS Code to OpenCode's headless API so users can ask questions, start and monitor background coding jobs, answer prompts and permission requests, and review changes across projects. It also exposes setup, model selection, job recovery, and configuration tools, along with resources and prompts, for multi-project workflows.
      25,826 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: one evaluates text against typed questions, while the other lists available models. There is no overlap in purpose or parameters that would cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names use a consistent jev_ prefix and snake_case, but jev_evaluate is action-oriented while jev_models is a resource listing. This is a minor deviation from a pure verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin for a server, though each tool has a valid role in a minimal evaluation API wrapper. It is borderline rather than clearly well-scoped or severely mismatched.

    Completeness4/5

    The core evaluation workflow and model discovery are covered, but there are minor gaps such as no batch evaluation, validation, or result-retrieval tooling. These are workable omissions for a thin MCP wrapper.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources