get_user_info
Retrieve details of the currently authenticated user, including their identity and account information.
Instructions
Get information about the authenticated user
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve details of the currently authenticated user, including their identity and account information.
Get information about the authenticated user
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the action without mentioning side effects, authentication requirements, or return value nature. Lacks transparency beyond basic purpose.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Description is a single concise sentence that directly conveys the tool's purpose. No wasted words; appropriately front-loaded for quick agent parsing.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but minimal. It does not explain what 'information' is returned or how it differs from sibling 'get_authenticated_user', so completeness is moderate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters in schema, so baseline score of 4 applies. Description adds no additional parameter semantics, which is fine since none exist.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states it gets info about the authenticated user (specific verb+resource). However, sibling 'get_authenticated_user' exists with a very similar purpose, and no differentiation is provided, so clarity is slightly reduced.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling 'get_authenticated_user' could be a similar tool, but description does not clarify the distinction or provide context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/delano/postman-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server