Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to OmniBrowse-Agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A browser-automation MCP server providing persistent browser profiles per domain, Bitwarden credential injection without exposing passwords, and playbook recording/replay for repeatable tasks.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Browser-based research MCP server that drives a real Chromium browser via patched Playwright to access JavaScript-rendered content, dynamic tables, and login-walled dashboards. It provides tools for visiting URLs to extract DOM text and screenshots, and for performing structured data extraction using Anthropic Claude Sonnet.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for web research using anti-detect Camoufox browser. Enables search, page reading (including JS/SPA), batch fetching, clicking, typing, and live browsing sessions with caching and retries.
      61
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for JavaScript reverse engineering that enables AI to perform browser debugging, script analysis, and automated hook injection. It streamlines complex workflows like deobfuscation, network tracing, and risk assessment through direct browser integration.
      35
      34 npm
      1,004
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Meshbrow that gives AI agents full browser automation capabilities with stealth anti-detection, enabling natural language control of browser sessions, data extraction, and multi-browser fleets.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for browser automation that drives Chrome via an extension, preserving login state and offering 45 tools for navigation, interaction, scraping, and screenshots.
      53
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.9/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have unclear or missing descriptions. browser_act, browser_snapshot, and browser_extract overlap in purpose without clear boundaries. The generic 'act' could subsume click_mark or scroll, and 'snapshot' may duplicate the marked viewport from navigate.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share the 'browser_' prefix, which is good, but the second part mixes verb phrases (navigate, click_mark, scroll) with noun phrases (tabs, snapshot). 'browser_act' is too vague and breaks the more descriptive pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    9 tools is a reasonable size for a browser automation server. The count is not excessive and covers major browsing actions, though some tools could be consolidated.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers core browsing actions like navigation, clicking, scrolling, session management, and tabs. However, there are potential gaps such as form fill, back/forward, or wait operations, and the generic 'act' and 'extract' tools leave it unclear whether those capabilities are fully addressed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues