overleaf-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to overleaf-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, write, compile, and manage Overleaf projects through MCP, including file operations, project administration, and LaTeX compilation diagnostics.165 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, edit, upload, compile, and manage projects in a self-hosted Overleaf Community Edition via MCP, while also providing a git remote for cloning and pushing changes.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for managing academic LaTeX projects in Overleaf: create projects, transfer files, compile documents, inspect compiler output, and download PDFs.1625 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for Overleaf that allows Claude or other agents to navigate projects, read and edit .tex files, compile, and interact with review-panel comments via Overleaf's real-time Socket.IO API, with seamless support for tracked changes as pending suggestions.1764 npm4AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with Overleaf projects, enabling project listing, file reads, LaTeX section discovery, and revision-guarded writes through natural language.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, edit, and compile LaTeX documents in Overleaf projects with tracked changes via the Model Context Protocol.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Comment operations (list, read, reply, resolve, reopen, add), tracked changes (list, accept, reject), file operations (create, read, edit, delete, rename, upload), downloads (file, project, output), and compile/log functions are all non-overlapping. Even similar-sounding tools like edit_file and find_and_replace are clearly differentiated.
Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout (read_comment_thread, list_projects, open_project, list_files, read_file, edit_file, compile, read_log, list_comments, reply_comment, resolve_comment, reopen_comment, list_tracked_changes, accept_changes, reject_changes, download_file, download_project, download_output, create_folder, create_file, upload_file, rename_entity, delete_entity, add_comment). The slight deviation of find_and_replace and ping does not break the overall pattern.
With 26 tools, this server is above the typical 3-15 range but is justified by the breadth of Overleaf's feature set. The tools cover project management, editing, comments, tracked changes, compilation, and downloads, each earning its place. It could be trimmed slightly (e.g., consolidating download_* tools) but is reasonably scoped.
The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of working with an Overleaf project: listing/opening projects, navigating and editing files, creating and managing entities, compiling and reading logs, handling comments and tracked changes, and downloading artifacts. No obvious gaps exist for typical agent workflows; the only missing operations would be administrative tasks like sharing or project deletion, which are out of scope for an MCP server.