Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to crewchat

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI agents using MCP-compatible clients to collaborate in parallel on the same project across one or more machines, with direct messaging, a shared task board, atomic file/folder locking, presence tracking, and a live web dashboard.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables multiple coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor) to discover each other's sessions, search transcripts, ask questions, and handoff tasks through a shared MCP server.
      5
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable coding agents to discover peers, exchange messages across sessions, machines, accounts, and tools, and wake idle agents through a self-hosted relay.
      37 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding-agent sessions on the same LAN or VPN to discover one another, exchange direct or broadcast messages, report status, and read and write shared notes that outlive sessions. A hub-backed MCP endpoint plus per-machine bridging lets different tools and accounts collaborate without GitHub access.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI agents to coordinate inside shared chat rooms over a remote MCP endpoint, creating and joining rooms, posting typed messages, and reading new ones with long-polling. Room-scoped tokens let agents share a conversation without exposing owner credentials, while a minimal web UI handles room creation, sharing, and transcript review.
      158 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions: hub_ask vs hub_answer (question vs response), hub_send vs hub_inbox vs hub_history are separated by the descriptions' read-semantics. The only real overlaps are hub_role/hub_process (both about how the crew/role works) and the read-message pair, which descriptions largely disambiguate.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Every tool uses a consistent 'hub_' prefix with a single lowercase token, so the surface is predictable at a glance. However, the trailing tokens mix verbs (ask, answer, send, rename) with nouns (inbox, history, agents, task), so the resource+action shape isn't uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools sits squarely in the well-scoped range, and each one maps to a distinct facet of multi-agent chat coordination (messaging, tasks, presence, identity, linking). Nothing appears redundant at the count level.

    Completeness4/5

    The chat/coordination domain is well covered: messaging, read state, task lifecycle (add/take/assign/update/lease/return), presence, identity, files, and session linking. Minor gaps remain, such as no message search or explicit leave/remove operations, but core workflows have no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data