crewchat
Related Servers
Alternatives to crewchat
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables multiple AI agents using MCP-compatible clients to collaborate in parallel on the same project across one or more machines, with direct messaging, a shared task board, atomic file/folder locking, presence tracking, and a live web dashboard.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables multiple coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor) to discover each other's sessions, search transcripts, ask questions, and handoff tasks through a shared MCP server.56 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables MCP-capable coding agents to discover peers, exchange messages across sessions, machines, accounts, and tools, and wake idle agents through a self-hosted relay.37 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents on the same machine to join a local chat room over MCP so they can coordinate tasks and hand off context, with a browser view for following along.97 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding-agent sessions on the same LAN or VPN to discover one another, exchange direct or broadcast messages, report status, and read and write shared notes that outlive sessions. A hub-backed MCP endpoint plus per-machine bridging lets different tools and accounts collaborate without GitHub access.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables multiple AI agents to coordinate inside shared chat rooms over a remote MCP endpoint, creating and joining rooms, posting typed messages, and reading new ones with long-polling. Room-scoped tokens let agents share a conversation without exposing owner credentials, while a minimal web UI handles room creation, sharing, and transcript review.158 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct actions: hub_ask vs hub_answer (question vs response), hub_send vs hub_inbox vs hub_history are separated by the descriptions' read-semantics. The only real overlaps are hub_role/hub_process (both about how the crew/role works) and the read-message pair, which descriptions largely disambiguate.
Every tool uses a consistent 'hub_' prefix with a single lowercase token, so the surface is predictable at a glance. However, the trailing tokens mix verbs (ask, answer, send, rename) with nouns (inbox, history, agents, task), so the resource+action shape isn't uniform.
14 tools sits squarely in the well-scoped range, and each one maps to a distinct facet of multi-agent chat coordination (messaging, tasks, presence, identity, linking). Nothing appears redundant at the count level.
The chat/coordination domain is well covered: messaging, read state, task lifecycle (add/take/assign/update/lease/return), presence, identity, files, and session linking. Minor gaps remain, such as no message search or explicit leave/remove operations, but core workflows have no dead ends.