step_over
Execute the current line and pause at the next one during debugging, skipping over function calls to maintain a high-level view of program execution.
Instructions
Step over
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sessionId | Yes |
Execute the current line and pause at the next one during debugging, skipping over function calls to maintain a high-level view of program execution.
Step over
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sessionId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as state changes, side effects, or required session prerequisites. The agent gets no information beyond the tool name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely terse (two words) but sacrifices clarity for brevity. It is not front-loaded with useful information and does not earn its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a debugger step command, the description is completely inadequate. It omits requirements (active session), behavior (execution advance), and output, given no output schema or annotations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter 'sessionId' is not described in the description. With 0% schema coverage, the description adds no meaning to the parameter, leaving the agent without guidance.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description is a tautology, restating the tool name 'step over' without specifying the action on a resource. It does not distinguish from sibling tools like step_into or step_out.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as step_into or step_out. The description lacks any context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/debugmcp/mcp-debugger'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server