turbosmtp
Related Servers
Alternatives to turbosmtp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server implementation that allows sending emails over MailPace's fast transactional email API.11MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA minimal MCP server that provides a send_email tool for sending HTML email through an SMTP relay.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server provides email sending functionality using Protonmail's SMTP service. It allows both Claude Desktop and Cline VSCode extension to send emails on your behalf using your Protonmail credentials.50MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA minimal MCP server for reading and sending emails via IMAP/SMTP, supporting multiple accounts in a single instance with zero external dependencies.1-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that sends mail over SMTP, gated behind an allowlist and a human confirmation4368MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA minimal MCP server for reading, searching, managing, and sending email over IMAP and SMTP.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The tools have some overlap in purpose, as both get_analytics_data and get_analytics_data_by_id retrieve analytics data, which could cause confusion for an agent deciding between them. However, their descriptions clarify that one uses a date range and the other uses a message ID, providing enough distinction to avoid major misselection. The send_email tool is clearly distinct, targeting a different function.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_analytics_data, get_analytics_data_by_id, send_email), with clear and predictable naming conventions. There are no deviations in style or format, making it easy for agents to understand and use the tools.
With only 3 tools, this server feels under-scoped for an email service domain like TurboSMTP, which typically involves more operations such as managing contacts, templates, or handling bounces. The count is too low to cover the expected functionality, limiting agent capabilities.
There are significant gaps in the tool surface for an email service. While sending emails and retrieving analytics are covered, essential operations like managing email lists, handling attachments, or configuring settings are missing. This incompleteness will likely cause agent failures in broader email-related tasks.