Skip to main content
Glama
de-Blanck

protonmail-mcp-server

by de-Blanck

Related Servers

Alternatives to protonmail-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that reads, searches, organizes, and deletes Proton Mail through the local Proton Mail Bridge, with read-only mode and sender authentication checks. It cannot send mail.
      117 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to interact with Proton Mail through a self-hosted server that works alongside Proton Mail Bridge. It provides read-only mailbox tools such as listing folders, searching mail, and retrieving messages while keeping Bridge isolated from the network.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A security-first MCP server that provides AI agents with a scoped, read-and-draft-only view into Proton Mail via Proton Bridge, ensuring no emails can be sent and access is restricted to configured workspaces.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that lets ChatGPT search and read a Proton Mail account through Proton Mail Bridge. It provides mailbox listing, mail search, and single-message retrieval without the ability to send, modify, or delete email.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server providing AI agents a scoped, read-and-draft-only view into Proton Mail via Proton Bridge, with code-enforced restrictions preventing external access or sending.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to read and search Proton Mail messages through a locally running Proton Mail Bridge. It provides tools like list_folders, list_messages, search_messages, get_message, and get_attachment.
      6
      10 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: listing folders, listing emails, searching emails, and retrieving full email content. No overlap, even between list and search due to search's advanced filtering.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'proton_verb_noun' snake_case pattern (list_folders, list_emails, search_emails, get_email). No deviation in style or convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools, the set is small but appropriate for a read-only email interface. It covers essential reading operations without unnecessary bloat, though some users might expect a few more common actions.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover the core read workflow (list folders, list/search emails, read full email) well, but completely lack write operations like send, delete, move, or mark as read. This is a notable gap for full email management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues