A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceLocal-first MCP server for indexing and searching research materials (papers, notes, logs, READMEs) using SQLite FTS, with tools for memory management and evidence retrieval.
MIT
second-brain-mcp
by ddmanyes
Related Servers
Alternatives to second-brain-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for a personal knowledge base that captures and structures idea fragments, enabling MCP-capable agents to search, retrieve, and add notes with semantic links and clustering.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for local knowledge management with Markdown and PDF indexing using SQLite FTS5.532 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA personal knowledge base MCP server with semantic search, storing thoughts in PostgreSQL with pgvector embeddings and providing 8 tools for capture, search, browse, stats, relations, traces, and hydration.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP Server for local knowledge management. Semantic + keywords + tags8194 PyPI24MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLocal MCP server for indexing personal knowledge into SQLite with hybrid search, chunk-level citations, memory tools, and agent orchestration.4MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 46 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Several search/retrieval tools overlap in purpose (search_notes, search_articles, search_snippets, search_news_tool, search_grouped, query_graph), and sync tools (sync_index, sync_notes, sync_chunks_tool) or write tools (update_note, append_to_note, new_note) can be confused without careful reading. The descriptions do clarify target and method, so boundaries exist but require effort.
Naming Consistency3/5
Mostly snake_case, but patterns vary: verb_noun (search_notes), noun-first (auth_context, index_stats, vault_sleep, sleep_status, health_check), and an inconsistent _tool suffix on about nine tools. The naming is readable but not uniform.
Tool Count2/5
46 tools is well above the typical 3–15 range and feels heavy even for a broad vault-management domain. Many tools could be consolidated or grouped without losing capability.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers note CRUD, search, indexing, article ingestion, figure management, graph queries, synthesis, admin, and health checks. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit delete/rename/move note tool), but archival/pruning tools mitigate some of that.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues