Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
ddmanyes

second-brain-mcp

by ddmanyes
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to second-brain-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ContemPlace

      freegyes
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for a personal knowledge base that captures and structures idea fragments, enabling MCP-capable agents to search, retrieve, and add notes with semantic links and clustering.
      3
      MIT
    • Wenlan by wenlan-app

      Wenlanofficial

      wenlan-app
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first personal wiki and memory server for AI agents. MCP clients can capture knowledge, retrieve context, read and maintain source-backed wiki pages, and carry project context between sessions.
      33
      92
      Apache 2.0

    • mybrain

      robertsfeir
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A personal knowledge base MCP server with semantic search, storing thoughts in PostgreSQL with pgvector embeddings and providing 8 tools for capture, search, browse, stats, relations, traces, and hydration.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    Context All Your Agents Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and hold it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 46 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several search/retrieval tools overlap in purpose (search_notes, search_articles, search_snippets, search_news_tool, search_grouped, query_graph), and sync tools (sync_index, sync_notes, sync_chunks_tool) or write tools (update_note, append_to_note, new_note) can be confused without careful reading. The descriptions do clarify target and method, so boundaries exist but require effort.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Mostly snake_case, but patterns vary: verb_noun (search_notes), noun-first (auth_context, index_stats, vault_sleep, sleep_status, health_check), and an inconsistent _tool suffix on about nine tools. The naming is readable but not uniform.

    Tool Count2/5

    46 tools is well above the typical 3–15 range and feels heavy even for a broad vault-management domain. Many tools could be consolidated or grouped without losing capability.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers note CRUD, search, indexing, article ingestion, figure management, graph queries, synthesis, admin, and health checks. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit delete/rename/move note tool), but archival/pruning tools mitigate some of that.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources