cogmem
Related Servers
Alternatives to cogmem
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceLocal Markdown-backed memory tools for Codex and other MCP-capable agents. Exposes durable agent knowledge via CLI and MCP server.5MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePersistent encrypted memory for AI agents. E2E encrypted private vaults, shared knowledge commons, topic channels, and agent-to-agent DMs. 23 MCP tools, free, no API key needed.24-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA zero-dependency, file-based persistent memory system for AI agents with tiered memory, Ebbinghaus decay, and keyword retrieval.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceHand a project over — to your next session, to Cursor/Codex/Gemini, to your successor — with the reasons attached. Local-first memory MCP for coding agents: decisions re-injected before the agent acts, drift detection across every project you run. One SQLite file, nothing leaves your machine.71,548 npm16MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA different approach from typical persistent-memory MCPs. Instead of a local SQLite + embeddings store, the memory lives as plain files in a .ai-memory/ directory you commit to your repo (facts.jsonl, decisions/\*.md, gotchas.md). Git is the sync layer — what one Claude/Cursor/Cline learns about a repo, the next session (or a teammate's agent) picks up automatically. 5 MCP tools: get_rep575 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSmart memory for AI agents. Solves the Karpathy problem: memories decay, topics are frequency-weighted, one-time questions don't become obsessions. 7 tools. Zero deps.49 npm2MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first memory layer for AI coding agents — captures issues, attempts, fixes, and decisions, and warns at git commit before you repeat a mistake.17729 PyPI876MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceLocal-first project memory for AI coding agents. Records failed attempts, fragile files, and decisions per repo, and warns the agent via hooks before it repeats a recorded mistake.689 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides AI coding agents with a local-first persistent memory layer they can read and write during sessions, storing decisions, preferences, error patterns, and research per project or globally. Enables semantic and keyword search, formatted context recall, and cross-project guideline surfacing without API keys or cloud storage.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to read and write persistent, local-first memory across sessions and projects, with semantic search, global guidelines, and optional autonomous task execution.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceGives AI coding agents persistent, local-first memory so they can store, semantically search, and recall decisions, preferences, error patterns, and cross-project guidelines directly during a session. It also optionally queues tasks for autonomous execution against that same memory.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to share persistent local memory across sessions and agents, so rules, mandatory specs, verified code snippets, and past mistakes are automatically surfaced before code is generated. It also lets agents log repeated failures as recurrence-counted 'vaccines', preventing the same errors from recurring across Claude, VS Code agents, and local LLMs.72MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: note saves memories, recall retrieves them, progress summarizes project state, receipt provides cryptographic proofs, review_pending lists pending rules, status reports system health, tree_head returns the Merkle root, and verify performs deep audit. No overlapping functionality.
All tool names are lowercase with underscores for compounds (e.g., review_pending, tree_head). They follow a consistent pattern of verbs or noun phrases that clearly indicate the action or output, with no style mixing.
With 8 tools, the set is well-scoped for a verifiable memory system. It covers storing, retrieving, verifying, and monitoring without being bloated or too sparse.
The tools provide core operations (create, read, verify, audit). Missing explicit update/delete tools is a minor gap, but this aligns with the system's append-only, tamper-evident design. A tool for exact-match retrieval could be useful, but semantic recall covers most needs.