get_notifications

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Since no annotations are provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the operation is read-only ('Returns') and that results are 'recent', which implies a temporal ordering. However, it does not explain pagination behavior, the definition of 'recent', or the structure of the returned notifications, leaving gaps in the behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of seven words, containing no redundant or vague phrases. It is well-structured and front-loaded, every word adding value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema and annotations, the description should clarify the return format, pagination, and the meaning of 'recent'. It does not explain these aspects, and the schema parameters are not elaborated, making the description incomplete for an agent to fully understand what to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides only types and defaults for limit and offset without descriptions, and the tool description does not mention these parameters. With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to compensate by explaining their semantics, leaving the agent to rely on common sense or prior knowledge.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Returns' and the resource 'notifications', with scoping details 'recent' and 'for the authenticated user'. This distinguishes it from siblings like get_notification_count (which returns a count) and delete_notification (which deletes).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving notifications but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_notification_count or delete_notification. There are no exclusion criteria or alternative suggestions, leaving the agent to infer the appropriate context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.