Skip to main content
Glama
dcl632

phi-guard-mcp

by dcl632
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to phi-guard-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • phi-redact-mcp

      Rinava
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that redacts PII/PHI from text before it ever reaches an LLM — self-hosted, fail-closed, and HIPAA-aware.
      3
      MIT

    • wardcat-mcp

      oguzhantopcu0
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing on-prem PII detection and anonymization tools (scan and is_sensitive) for AI agents, ensuring data stays local.
      4
      MIT

    • HealthClawGuardrails

      aks129
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Open-source guardrails between AI agents and FHIR clinical data — PHI redaction, immutable audit, step-up auth, tenant isolation. MCP server + OpenAI/Gemini adapters. A healthclaw.io project.
      29
      30
      MIT
    • omitly-mcp by omitly

      omitly-mcpofficial

      omitly
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for local, verifiable PDF redaction. Enables AI agents to find sensitive regions, locate text, redact PDFs on-device, verify redaction and tamper-evidence seals, and generate PDFs—without uploading confidential documents.
      8
      194 npm
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a distinct purpose: scanning, redacting, validating absence, and auditing. There is no overlap in function.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools follow a verb_phi or verb_deidentification pattern, but 'audit_deidentification' uses a different noun than the others ('phi'), causing slight inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is appropriate for a focused PHI detection/redaction server. It covers key operations without excess.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers detection, redaction, validation, and audit. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to manage or customize identifier patterns, but the core workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources