helius_get_asset
Retrieve detailed information about any Solana digital asset using its unique ID.
Instructions
Get details of a digital asset by its ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Retrieve detailed information about any Solana digital asset using its unique ID.
Get details of a digital asset by its ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations and description only says 'Get details'. Lacks behavioral traits like required permissions, error conditions, data freshness, or output format expectations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, concise and front-loaded. But could be more informative while maintaining conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema and description does not mention return type or differentiate from many similar sibling tools. Agent lacks context to decide if this tool is appropriate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and description adds no meaning beyond the parameter name 'id'. Does not clarify whether the ID is an address, mint, or other identifier.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'details of a digital asset by its ID'. Distinguishes from sibling tools like heilus_get_asset_batch or heilus_search_assets by specifying retrieval by single ID.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as heilus_get_asset_batch for multiple assets or heilus_search_assets for queries. Missing context about prerequisites or limitations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dcSpark/mcp-server-helius'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server