Skip to main content
Glama
dburton-influxdata

Telegraf Controller MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Telegraf Controller MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes live network monitoring data as Resources and diagnostic capabilities as Tools, letting AI assistants query network health conversationally.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to manage Defined Networking / Managed Nebula infrastructure, supporting tasks like network topology design, host provisioning, and security auditing through natural language.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage SSH terminal sessions, execute commands, and automate server operations through natural language, with multi-tab support and session persistence.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to query databases, execute SQL, and manage Metabase resources like dashboards, cards, and collections through natural language.
      22
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to control Home Assistant via natural language, including device control, automation management, and system configuration.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are largely distinct, but get_config and get_config_details could be confused without reading descriptions carefully. get_agent_details and get_agent_summary are clearly differentiated by scope.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: list_, get_, create_, update_, delete_. Even health_check fits the pattern. No camelCase or mixed styles.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is on the higher side but appropriate for managing three distinct resources (configs, agents, reporting rules). Each tool serves a clear purpose and the count is not excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    Configs and reporting rules have full CRUD coverage. Agents lack create/update operations, but this may be intentional since agents are likely auto-discovered. No major dead ends for the core workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues