dbt-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to dbt-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP (model context protocol) server for interacting with dbt Docs11 PyPI23MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides tools to interact with dbt, including dbt Core, Cloud CLI, Semantic Layer, and Discovery API.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that wraps the dbt CLI tool, enabling AI coding agents to interact with dbt projects through standardized MCP tools. Developed by Mammoth Growth.918MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that exposes dbt project artifacts and data quality result tables (BigQuery/Postgres) to LLM clients, enabling deep introspection, run-history analysis, source freshness, test coverage, and lineage walks.2736 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for executing Malloy queries and managing Malloy resources.52MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) Server for the mcp API.1,632 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between 'build' and 'run' (both execute models), and 'compile' and 'parse' (both involve processing project files). Descriptions help clarify differences, but an agent might still confuse these pairs in certain contexts.
Naming is inconsistent with mixed patterns: some use verb_noun (e.g., 'get_all_models', 'list_metrics'), others use single verbs (e.g., 'build', 'run', 'compile'), and some are noun-based (e.g., 'docs'). This lack of a uniform convention makes the set harder to navigate and predict.
With 16 tools, the count is reasonable for a dbt server covering core operations, project management, and semantic layer queries. It's slightly on the higher side but well within an acceptable range for the domain's complexity.
The tool set comprehensively covers dbt functionality: core commands (build, run, test), project inspection (compile, parse, list), model details retrieval, and full semantic layer operations (list_metrics, query_metrics with supporting tools). No obvious gaps exist for typical dbt workflows.