Jobs-tools-knowledgeBase-resetUserProfile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It explicitly warns 'DANGER: Irreversible', which is a key behavioral trait beyond what the schema or name conveys. However, it does not explain what 'default values' encompass or the role of the keepUserKey parameter, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that states the action and includes a prominent danger warning. Every word earns its place, making it highly concise and effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description is adequate for a simple reset tool, it lacks context about the user key (keepUserKey) and the exact effects of resetting. Given the irreversible nature and optional parameter, more detail would improve completeness, but the tool is relatively simple.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the only parameter keepUserKey already fully described in the schema. The tool description does not add any parameter-specific information, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Reset user profile to default values' clearly states the action and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like updateUserProfile and getUserProfile. The 'DANGER: Irreversible' warning adds further clarity about the operation's nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this tool is for resetting a user profile to defaults, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives like updateUserProfile. The danger warning serves as a caution, but no concrete usage context or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.